Meituan · Local Services · IM Consultation · 2025

Rebuilding the Black Box

From “price transparency” to “trusted diagnosis” in local home services.

Context · The product

Meituan local services is a super-app marketplace.

Uber

on-demand, on-site

Yelp

discover & compare merchants

TaskRabbit

real people do the work

Meituan

0M+

Annual users

0.0M

Merchants

My role

Platform Architecture team.
I own UX and UI for consumer Home Services.

This project had two goals. For users: make high-stakes services feel less uncertain and less stressful. For the platform: standardize the conversation, cut friction, and lift order conversion.

Broken trust · A user's words

“My drain was clogged. I spent 30 minutes and asked 10 shops.

None would give a certain price. They all said ‘we have to see it first’.

And once the guy shows up, the price only goes up.”

A pattern we heard again and again in user research

Broken trust

Why showing prices didn't help:
deals actually close in the chat.

Users chat before they book. That is exactly where trust breaks: the diagnosis happens after the visit, but the rules force users to decide before it. Merchants price on the spot. Both sides close a half-random deal.

Today · A linear journey

  1. 01A problem happens
  2. 02A wall of merchants appears
  3. 03Repeat the story to each one
  4. 04Pick one, half at random

→ Trust breaks

Quote ≠ final bill. It ends in a surprise bill and a bad review.

The first attempt, and the real insight

We shipped a standalone price page. Nothing moved.

We listed prices by service category. A price without a diagnosis is just a claim: users didn't believe it, and merchants didn't maintain it.

Users never asked “how much”. They asked “how was this number made, and will it hold”. Price is not a number problem. It is a process-trust problem.

A real user review behind the PRD

★★★★★

“The page said $50. On site he added $200 for a ‘special case’. A total rip-off!”

Reviews like this were everywhere. The information gap made every price feel unfair.

Options we weighed

We explored two directions first. Both got killed.

Option A

Option A: a priced diagnosis visit

The user pays a visit fee. A pro comes, diagnoses, then they decide whether to repair.

Why it failed: competitors already do this, and users still don't trust the verdict; the shop has every reason to make it sound worse. A visit is a heavy commitment; if you don't repair, you start all over.

Option B

Option B: protect the user's exit

The user can cancel any time after the visit. Every add-on charge needs online approval.

Why it failed: the platform eats the visit cost. Too expensive, and bad for merchants.

Option C · What we built

Keep the chat habit. Move the on-site diagnosis up front, as a platform-level standard diagnosis. One order, many quotes.

The key call: the problem lives at the diagnosis step. If the diagnosis isn't standardized, nothing downstream can patch it.

Service blueprint

Five steps. The diagnosis moves into the conversation.

  1. 01User starts a chat
  2. 02Platform diagnoses first
  3. 03A structured repair order
  4. 04Merchants bid in real time
  5. 05One tap to book

O2O · Quote-based on-demand service

Quote-to-Service: the full transaction flow

01Listing

02Inquiry & match

03Booking & quote

04Pick & order

05Fulfilment

06Balance & redeem

User

Start a quote request

See quotes, pick one, order

Pay the balance online

Platform

List the service

Match it to the request

Create the booking

Create the order, bind the store

Create the balance order

Merchant

Receive and quote

Get the confirmation

Do the on-site service

Confirm redemption

The user's only decision point. Everything else hands off automatically in one order context.

Blueprint · 01 Diagnose first (one standard)

No more repeating yourself to 10 shops.

The platform owns the ask-and-diagnose step inside the chat. A local human expert talks to the user live, diagnoses from photos and video, and it takes about 5 minutes. It costs more to run, and it is worth it, because it builds a trust moat.

Shipped version · Chinese

Rebuilt version · English · Live

Blueprint · 02 A structured repair order

“My toilet keeps hissing” becomes
a standardized repair order.

The order keeps the user's original photos and words, so merchants can judge with both.

Shipped version · Chinese

Rebuilt version · English · Live

Blueprint · 03 Live quotes, one standard

Within 3 minutes: 5 nearby shops, one order.

Merchants quote against the exact same order: a fixed price or a hard-capped range (like $80-$120). The user compares price and speed on one standard, instead of asking shop by shop.

Shipped version · Chinese

Rebuilt version · English · Live

Core interaction · A conversation that answers back

The user always knows:
where am I, and what happens next.

A stage guide sits on top of the thread: Diagnosing ➔ Building the order ➔ Collecting quotes ➔ Locked. Cards inside the chat show their live state: quoting, or still searching.

Live prototype · English rebuild

Core interaction · 5 states of the quote card

A tight state machine for a 24-hour service.

Every quote arrives with an AI summary tag and the merchant's info. Users can open the details, or keep collecting new quotes. Tap a state below: the prototype switches to that scene.

“Visible but not clickable” gives control back to the user. When a quote times out, making the card vanish breaks the user's mental thread. So the expired price locks hard and can never reach the bill; the diagnosis and context stay; the card just grays out. To resume, no re-diagnosis: only the time slot is re-quoted.

Live · Expired

Core interaction · How merchants quote

Every merchant sees the same order. Users pick on price and speed.

Merchants receive the expert diagnosis plus the user's materials: photos, video, description. They save time too: no idle chat, straight to the point.

Reverse trust · The “You don't need us” path

Pushing small orders away
earns the longest-lasting trust.

If the diagnosis finds a tiny, fixable problem (like a worn washer), the system skips quoting and recommends a standard part and a how-to video: you can do this yourself.

Live prototype · self-serve path

Design system · Rebuilt for the US

Rebuilt in English,
with Claude Code and Claude Design.

To test this “trust conversation” in high-labor-cost markets (think TaskRabbit / Thumbtack), I rebuilt the Meituan-based design for US users. Expert diagnosis is too expensive there, so it becomes AI diagnosis.

Early version · Live

Repair Flow v1 · Live

US rebuild · AI agent diagnosis

Planning ahead:
an AI agent replaces the human expert.

In the US rebuild the first responder is an AI agent, not a human expert. It answers at 2 AM, reads photos and video, states its confidence, and drafts the same structured order. A human pro stays one tap away, and the quoting loop after it stays the same.

Live prototype · AI-agent workflow

Hierarchy & accessibility (ADA) · 01

Lower the information density

Remove the marketing widgets and loud color blocks. Add whitespace. Let the diagnosis lead.

Shipped version · dense

Rebuild · whitespace

Hierarchy & accessibility (ADA) · 02

Accessibility

Touch targets grow to 44×44pt. No type under 12px, no dark low-contrast icons. Every card reads aloud with a screen reader.

44×44 pt

Minimum touch target

≥12 px

Minimum type size

100 %

Cards readable by screen reader

Hierarchy & accessibility (ADA) · 03

US formats and native copy

MM/DD/YYYY; imperial units; copy rewritten to sound native.

Dates

2025-08-1208/12/2025

Units & currency

¥200 · 5 km$45-60 · 3.1 mi

Copy tone

师傅已接单A pro's on it

Design system · Shared components

The conversation cards are now shared components (Design System Tokens), ready to carry into maternity care, banquets and other high-stakes services.

Pilot results · User-level randomized A/B

July-August · Hangzhou + parts of Zhejiang · toilet repair & drain clearing

CategoryBeforeAfterLift
Toilet repair9%11.7%+30% relative
Drain clearing17%22%+29.4% relative

0.0×

Diagnostic channel: intent-to-order converts at 1.3× the old path

+0.0pp

Search overall: net conversion gain

~0

Projected at full rollout: about 2,000 extra orders a day

−0%

Pricing complaints: projected to drop 50%

The test group saw our expert-diagnosis, one-order-many-quotes popup right after searching a keyword.

Risk & AI evolution · Multimodal AI diagnosis

Huge user data.
Training our own AI model is the obvious next step.

The platform holds a huge corpus of real consultations and real fulfilment records: training data no one else has. To break the expert bottleneck, the next step is a multimodal AI assistant, trained on the early human-diagnosis dataset.

Training data pipeline

  1. Photos

  2. Text

  3. Repair orders

  4. Actual fulfilment: what was done, what was replaced, what was charged

Risk · Adverse selection

Users shouldn't compare price.
They should compare price divided by trust.

This mechanism systematically selects three kinds of merchants: the desperate, the bad estimators, and the lowball-then-upsell players. Lowballing is the dominant strategy, unless breaking your quote costs more than it earns. So every quote must carry a fulfilment score: how often this shop's final bill lands inside its quote.

Complaints

No more haggling with support. The price gap is refunded first, instantly.

Full interactive prototype · Switch any scene

Open full page

Switch flows from the rail under the phone, or tap the suggested replies. English / USD is the US rebuild; the shipped product is Chinese with RMB.